Archives For November 2013

Latest news from the Wikileaks party

The battle lines are clearly drawn.

At a time when food security in the developing countries is snowballing into a major trade conflict between the developed and developing countries, what in reality is at stake is the livelihood security of an estimated 1.5 billion small farmers in the majority world.

Food security is simply a smokescreen to provide a cover-up for the global efforts being made to dismantle the very foundations of Third World agriculture.

Numerous U.S. farm groups have written to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman as well as U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack objecting to linking food aid with price support programmes.

Not finding anything wrong in legitimate domestic food aid programmes, 30 farm commodity export groups have however expressed concern at the price support programmes, which have more to do with boosting farm incomes and increasing production than feeding the poor.

These U.S. farm commodity export groups, which ironically receive monumental federal support every year, have questioned the need to provide any relaxation in current discipline even on a temporary basis. Accordingly, such an exemption will result in more subsidy outgo and result in further damage to U.S. trade interests.

This response comes in the wake of a representation by 15 of the major farmer unions of India, including the Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU) and the Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha (KRRS), to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh: Forth-seven years after the green revolution was launched, India is being directed at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to dismantle its food procurement system built so assiduously over the past four decades. Read more…..

uranium20shortage20mining20nuclear20power20photo-2-400x3051-300x228Credible sources in the uranium sections of resource companies first told The Stringer, in February, of futurist uranium mining plans that are being deliberated by mining companies for Western Australia – which is rich in high grade uranium, and which is easily accessible in this infrastructure wealthy State. They described a burgeoning relationship with India, the world’s most populous nation, as a market for the uranium. But they said every mining company, bent on the profit motive is cognisant of the world’s increasing energy needs as population and technology increase. A couple of insiders estimate potentially 40 uranium mines will arise right throughout Western Australia in the decades to come.

Environmentalists reject that this is possible while Aboriginal Elders resident on Country say they will resist uranium mining at all costs.

Local Aboriginal Elder Mr Glen Cooke has travelled from Wiluna to attend Toro Energy’s annual meeting today to highlight community concern over Toro’s plans for uranium mining in the region. Mr Cooke and another proxy shareholder, Kylie Fitzwater, have come to Perth to raise concerns about Toro’s long term plans and the company’s failure to communicate these to Wiluna residents.

“Toro have been talking about one project on the Lake and now we hear that they are planning lots of uranium mines from Meekatharra all the way to Lake Maitland.”

“They never talked to us about that,” said Mr Cooke.

“Me and my family we never wanted one uranium mine, we sure don’t want seven of them scattered through that country.”

“Does this mean they will put uranium on trucks from all over and bring it to Wiluna and if so what will they do with the radioactive mine waste, and where will they get the water?”

“It’s just too dangerous. This is people’s homes, not just in town but we live all over and love all of that country. That place is a very special place – for all men north to south, east to west. It’s is too important to muck it up, once it’s broken it is broken forever, we could never get that back.”

“We don’t need this uranium; people in Japan don’t want it – not after Fukushima. Toro need to leave it in the ground where it belongs,” said Mr Cooke.

Kylie Fitzwater, who has family connections to Wiluna, said “we were already worried about 9.1 million tonnes of radioactive mine waste being stored on the Lake bed – now this could be doubled. We’ve been worried about where they’re going to get the water from – 3.1million litres a day – is that going to double too? This proposal is going from bad to worse and we’re all being kept in the dark about it.

“We are calling on the State and Federal Governments to stop any further approvals or development of the Wiluna uranium mine until the full project can be assessed and made public.

“The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has a responsibility to ensure that these uranium deposits are not developed in an ad hoc way but carefully considered based on the risk and impact to the environment. This cannot be done by chopping up a massive project into little bits.”

Western Australia may well be exporting uranium within two years after earlier in the year the Federal Government granted environmental approval to Toro Energy’s Wiluna project – To many people this was unexpected, including to Wiluna’s Aboriginal peoples and to anti-uranium mining and anti-nuclear advocates nationwide.

The then Federal Environment Minister, Tony Burke decided to provide the go-ahead to Toro’s $270 million uranium mining project. This allowed Toro Energy to enter financial negotiations with potential joint venture partners. Some of the touted potential venture partners are in China, India, Japan and South Korea.

Toro Energy needs to reach a mining agreement – an Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) – with the two Native Title claimants in and near Wiluna. This though will be little problem for them despite many within the Aboriginal communities – Wiluna and Tarlpa peoples – vehemently against uranium mining on their Country. Wiluna senior Elder, Glen Cooke has been a long time outspoken critic of uranium mining.

“Uranium should stay in the ground. It can hurt our Country, the environment, our people, our children, our children’s children,” said Mr Cooke.

The Native Title Act is set up in such a way that both parties must enter into ‘good faith’ negotiations and hopefully come to a mutually beneficial deal within six months. If this fails you can count on the mining still going ahead. You can also count on the National Native Title Tribunal in granting the various licences required by the resource company and you can count on the Office of the Registrar of Aboriginal Corporations to stand idly by.

Once Toro’s project is operational, with a timeline of 2015, hence two open-cut mines at Centipede and Lake Way may well produce at least 780 tonnes of uranium oxide a year – for at least 14 years.

But the Conservation Council of WA anti-nuclear campaign coordinator Mia Pepper said at the time she believed Western Australians can stand in the way of uranium mining.

“The Federal Minister’s approval is an approval before the data is complete.”

“Toro still have huge gaps in their proposal, they have not secured, identified or done an impact study on water use for the life of the mine, nor have they completed geotechnical studies on the lake bed where they intend to store 9.1 million cubic metres of radioactive mine waste,” said Ms Pepper.

“This conditional approval is not a final approval as the conditions (by Minister Burke) spell out a number of new areas of approval Toro need to get alongside the mine closure plan, the land clearing permits, export licenses and more.”

Minister Burke’s approval came with a suite of conditions – 36 of them. One of them is that a guarantee is provided by Toro Energy that radiation does not pollute ground and surface water. The Minister may be looking ahead to what may eventuate – Coal Seam Gas fracking has embarrassed Australian Governments – Federal and State jurisdictions – with the obvious that the gas is leaking into underground and ground water systems despite denials from the industries and their underwriters, Federal and State Governments.

But well placed insiders in the resources sector, some of them in the uranium sections of resource companies, have told The Stringer, “For a long time the writing has been on the wall. Uranium mining will occur and it will be widespread. The nuclear age will come to Western Australia. The WA of 2030 will be different to the one of 2013. There will be at least 40 mining sites around the State in 2030, and WA will have nuclear reactors.”

“People may get sick at uranium mines and in transporting uranium and in other future plants and sites that will depend on that uranium but that’s par for the course. No-one will be forced to work in them, people do know the risks. Governments know the risks, the resource sector knows the risks but I am telling you this is what will happen and it is has been in the advanced planning stages for quite some time.”

Other insiders said that several mining sites may be underway in Western Australia by 2030 but agree that by 2050 and certainly by 2070 the State’s landscape will be littered with uranium mine sites and associated industry.

“It is wishful thinking by environmentalists to argue that uranium mining will not return a dividend. I can assure it’s the gold of the very near future. Uranium will be worth more and more with each decade and as new markets establish themselves, not just an expanded India market. With population growth and economies such as India and China, in the Middle East and everywhere in the world, the demand will eventually outstrip supply and uranium sales prices will skyrocket. Uranium is the oil of the future. Far too much technology, cutting edge and baseline will rely on energy needs that only uranium can en masse supply. Other energy sources may arise but in the industry, in research and development, right now the future is uranium and the nuclear age.”

“The (resource) industry is spending billions right now on the future (in reference to) uranium.”

“I can assure you every Australian Government will back us. And they are. I can assure you India wants our uranium and India will have as much uranium as we can mine. The Australian economy will override environmental concerns. Environmental rights do not override economic and social development rights, that’s the way it has always been and will always be. (Humanity) will not step back from (its bent on) technology and discovery.”

Once the first uranium mine is developed near Wiluna, every month three trucks will carry concentrated powdered ore which will have been sealed in drums and each with a United Nations inventory number. The trucks will make a 2,700 km journey to the port at Adelaide.

Toro Energy’s managing director Vanessa Guthrie was reported as saying, “It is very safe.”

“The plastic-lined drums are sealed and locked in pallets and we monitor the (radiation) exposure to the drivers who would be closest to the product.”

She said the occupational limit in reference to radiation exposure is 20 millisieverts and she said the drivers’ exposure “would be less than one millisievert a year.”

Former Federal Resources Minister and former Woodside Petroleum executive Gary Gray, a uranium mining and nuclear age advocate, welcomed then Minister Burke’s approval.

“The proposed mine will be the most advanced of the new generation of uranium mines in the world.”

He said uranium mining will provide social and economic benefits to local communities and to Australia.

This was reminiscent of once former anti-uranium and anti-nuclear campaigner, former Federal Labor minister Peter Garrett – former Midnight Oil lead singer. It was only a couple of years ago he was defending the Government’s decision to mine uranium and he argued Australia “has the world’s best practices” in mining uranium and with their nuclear reactors.

Ms Pepper said there is still time to halt the push for uranium to be mined.

“It is a long way from a Federal approval to an operating mine and we will be there every step of the way contesting and opposing this uranium mine and any other proposed uranium mine in WA.”

“Uranium is different. It is radioactive and poses great risks to workers, communities and the environment.”

“Uranium oxide can be very dangerous if ingested or inhaled.”

“Other breakdown products of uranium can also be dangerous – like Radon gas,” said Ms Pepper.

“Radon gas is the second biggest cause of lung cancer in the world.”

“The biggest concern with uranium mining is the long-term impacts of radioactive mine waste on country – how that is contained, whether that will get into the groundwater and the food chain.”

“There has never been a successful uranium mine in Australia. Each one has had its accidents, its spills, its leaks and its failed rehabilitation.”

“The Aboriginal communities that will be near these mines have legitimate concerns on how uranium mining and potential radiation fallout will impact on the environment – the animals, bush tucker, and their townships. Toro have done some opportunistic studies on road kill (dead animals) but they have not done detailed data analysis on the fauna passing through the region,” said Ms Pepper.

“Uranium is the asbestos of the 21st century.”

“The World Health Organisation, the United Nations and other international agencies recognise the risks of radiation and they all say that there is no safe dose of radiation.”

“What they are saying is that every dose of radiation increases the risk of developing cancer,” said Ms Pepper.

Ms Pepper is correct that there is no safe level of radiation according to the weight of scientific opinion which holds that there is no threshold below which ionising radiation poses no risk.

“We know that Australian uranium was in the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactors at the time of the multiple meltdowns. From cradle to the grave Australian uranium threatens country and lives.”

Elder Glen Cooke said that people within his community will inevitably die from radiation related sicknesses. “They are going to kill our people, some will die quickly, some by a thousand cuts.”

“We don’t want Maralinga all over again where our people will be hurt and die sick and young, and then for decades the truth will be hidden.”

Angst has ripped through Aboriginal communities at Wiluna and Yeeliree.

“The Government has not said they can guarantee there will not be radiation poisoning of people,” said Mr Cooke.

Yeeliree Traditional Owner and chairperson of the Western Australian Nuclear Free Alliance (WANFA) Kado Muir said that if uranium is mined a catastrophe is inevitable – only a matter of time.

“The Government and these mining companies are putting human life last.”

“How many Western Australian communities suffered lead and aluminium poisoning from leaks along freight routes and in the refineries despite all the promises that it would not happen?”

“They can’t protect us against lead and aluminium, how are they going to protect us against uranium?”

Canadian company CAMECO is also seeking to eventually mine uranium on Mr Muir’s Traditional Country at Yeeliree.

WANFA is a State wide anti-nuclear association whose members are Aboriginal Elders. Mr Muir said WANFA will “challenge the Australian Uranium Association’s Indigenous Dialogue Group who are representing the industry rather than a true Aboriginal community view.”

“We will also continue to expose anthropologists, archaeologists and pro-industry consultants who attempt to validate negligent practices of the mining industry.”

WANFA has made a number of calls for an independent public inquiry or royal commission into uranium mining. But these calls fall on the deaf ears of Government.

“We need an inquiry and when this happens then maybe Governments and the nuclear industry will be forced to stop minimising and trivialising the dangers of radiation,” said Mr Muir.

For each of the last three years at least a hundred walkers have walked the Walkatjurra Walk – from Yeeliree to Leonora to send the message to resource companies and Governments that they do not want the land they walk on mined for uranium. Mr Muir has been on all three walks – they take place in May, usually about three weeks long.

Last April, on the 26th, was the 27th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster. To this day the real death toll from the nuclear disaster is not known but it is more than the official record.

The Russian Government’s official death toll for Chernobyl is 46 but according to anti-nuclear campaigner, Dr Helen Caldicott it could be as high 985,000. What is on the record is that there has been a significant rise in cancer rates in the affected region.

The long latency periods, as with asbestos related mesotheliomas, have skewed the data on the incidence of radiation related disease.

In 2006 the Biological Effects of Ionising Radiation (BEIR) Committee of the US National Academy of Sciences reviewed the available data.

Their report stated, “The risk of cancer proceeds in a linear fashion at lower doses without a threshold.”

“The smallest dose has the potential to cause a small increase in risk to humans.”

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) estimated 30,000 fatal cancers from Chernobyl.

In 2006, twenty years after the Chernobyl disaster the World Health Organisation estimated up to 4,000 deaths among the Chernobyl population and more than 5,000 deaths among wider Ukranian and Belarus populations from the exposure to lower dose radiation.

A 2006 Greenpeace commissioned report – 52 scientists – estimated 93,000 deaths.

Dr Caldicott investigated a Russian report, “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment”. Underwritten by this report she argued 985,000 eventual deaths.

If Western Australia goes heavy duty with uranium mining, with say 40 uranium mines even as far away as the end of this century if not by 2030 or 2050, uranium mining will touch even more lives than does the ‘mining boom’ at this time – and lives will be touched in myriad ways – but with risks to environment and humanity the likes never known before in this country – not only are Aboriginal Elders concerned but so are many Australians, so should everyone be concerned.

“It’s as if the uranium miners don’t care about the earth, and that home can be somewhere else, and it’ll have to be because they will destroy this earth, they will poison it, radiation poison it, leaving nothing for our children – they’ve already begun with this, we’ve seen it in Europe and Japan. We have to do everything we can to stop all this,” said Mr Cooke.

Out of the Mouth of Babes … Syria

 —  November 30, 2013 — Leave a comment

Or, how the Tea Party is working hard to sabotage the dollar’s role in global finance.
foreignheldtreasuries
Figure 1: Share of publicly held Treasury debt held by foreign residents (blue squares), and held by China (red triangles). Solid squares/triangles denote data from annual benchmark surveys; open squares/triangles from monthly series. Source: TIC, and St. Louis Fed FRED.

From my op-ed “American Debt, Chinese Anxiety” in the International New York Times on Sunday:

Madison, Wisconsin — Last week, the United States once again walked up to the precipice of a debt default, and once again the world wonders why any country, much less the world’s largest economy, would endanger its financial reputation and thus its ability to borrow.

Though a potential global financial crisis was averted at the last minute, one notable development has been a string of warnings by Chinese officials. Prime Minister Li Keqiang told Secretary of State John Kerry that he was “highly concerned” about a possible default. Yi Gang, deputy governor of China’s central bank, warned that America “should have the wisdom to solve this problem as soon as possible.” An opinion essay in Xinhua, the state-run media agency, called “ for the befuddled world to start considering building a de-Americanized world.” Read more…..

 

Money-Photo-by-Pen-Waggener-300x199The Economic Collapse.

China just dropped an absolute bombshell, but it was almost entirely ignored by the mainstream media in the United States.  The central bank of China has decided that it is “no longer in China’s favor to accumulate foreign-exchange reserves”.  During the third quarter of 2013, China’s foreign-exchange reserves were valued at approximately $3.66 trillion.  And of course the biggest chunk of that was made up of U.S. dollars.  For years, China has been accumulating dollars and working hard to keep the value of the dollar up and the value of the yuan down.  One of the goals has been to make Chinese products less expensive in the international marketplace.  But now China has announced that the time has come for it to stop stockpiling U.S. dollars.  And if that does indeed turn out to be the case, than many U.S. analysts are suggesting that China could also soon stop buying any more U.S. debt.  Needless to say, all of this would be very bad for the United States. Read more…..

racialdiscrimination01The amendments sought to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 by the Australian Government will give rise to the advent of public race hate, foment racial tensions and solidify rampant racism according to the majority of non-Anglocentric cultures in Australia. Prime Minister Abbott’s Government is facing the likelihood of a standoff with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities over the proposed amendments but the Government is also facing a combined standoff with the Jewish, Arab, Armenian, Chinese, Greek, Lebanese and other Australian cultural groups.

In this Government’s first legislative move, the Attorney-General George Brandis is introducing a Bill to amend the Racial Discrimination Act that protects Australia’s cultural groups, which are in the hundreds, from what is tantamount to hate speech. Australia’s journey to establish anti-racism laws has been an arduous crawl but never in the last half century despite various reluctance and stonewalling has Australia legislatively gone backwards with anti-racism legislation, that is in repealing anti-racism legislation.

The various United Nations conventions on the fight to eliminate to racism, which Australia is party do not support Senator Brandis’ proposition to amend the Racial Discrimination Act. The Government appears to dislike the provision within Section 18C of the Act where it is unlawful to offend or insult people on the basis of their race. Senator Brandis’ move to amend this section of the Act is not seen by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders nor by the myriad migrant cultures nor by fair minded thinking Australians as championing freedom of expression but rather as the championing the right to open slather – the right to demean and to cast aspersion and slur leading to prejudice.

The Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt’s published criticisms of Aboriginal Australians who appear ‘white’ rather than ‘black’ landed him in Court, but it was not the comment in itself that they are ‘fair-skinned’ that landed him in Court – it was the stir within the language and turn of phrases he used, what amounted to (racially) offensive language. He effectively accused ‘white’ Australians with some Aboriginal heritage as cashing in on their Aboriginality despite in his view that Aboriginality is not their predominant identity. Mr Bolt claimed that some did this to cash in on various benefits and others to advance their careers.

Criticisms can be made constructively with all due courtesy and civility and without inciteful hate rendering arguments; without incurring slur and psychological harm upon others. This is the intent of the Racial Discrimination Act which the Australian Government is now intending to tamper with.

It is bewildering that with so much work yet to do in Australia, legislatively, in downing once and for all rampant racism, in a nation where the impacts and the wash of the White Australia Policy still languish, that what the Government’s first legislative striving will be is to strip back the Racial Discrimination Act.

The head of the Australian Jewry’s Executive Council, Peter Wertheim said that in repealing this section of the Act, that all cultural groups will be made vulnerable and put at-risk. Jewish leaders have spoken out against Mr Brandis’ proposal. Australian Jewry has united with the majority of Australian cultures and language groups to oppose this amendment.

We have read with growing concern that the Government plans to remove or water down the protections against racial vilification,” reads a statement signed by a diverse group of Australians including the National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Australian Hellenic Council, the Arab Council Australia, the Lebanese Muslim Association, the Chinese Australian Forum and the Armenian National Council of Australia.

The statement continues, “We oppose absolutely any such change. Paradoxically for free speech advocates, racial vilification can have a silencing effect on those who are vilified.”

Irfan Yusuf is a lawyer and a former Liberal candidate but is critical of the proposed amendment. He said the enabling of the Act in 1975 complied Australia with its “international legal obligations including the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.” “Twenty years later, the Act was amended introduce provisions on racial hatred. These provisions, contained in Section 18C, make it unlawful for someone to publicly do something that is reasonably likely to offend, assault, humiliate or intimidate someone or a group,” said Mr Yusuf.

“Now it isn’t just any action that could be unlawful, it must be an action that is done because of the other person or group’s race, colour or national or ethnic origin.”

These provisions were passed with the support of both the then Prime Minister Paul Keating’s Government and the then John Howard led Opposition.

Mr Yusuf suggested that Andrew Bolt has the ear of Government, and that he is being supported by like-minded thinkers within the Government who harbour what should be outdated views of how one can address others. “The existence of Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act hasn’t stopped Bolt from vilifying African, refugees, Muslims, Lebanese and other groups. Nor has it stopped the moderators of his blogs from publishing violent, paranoid, racist and even genocidal remarks.”

“Yet now, for the benefit of Bolt and his employers, Brandis is prepared to abandon his own principles, allowing Bolt to use his substantial power to trample on the weak and vilify minorities.”

Mr Yusuf argyed the importance of 18C. “(You) may recall the adverse 2007 report of the Australian Communications and Media Authority about Alan Jones. (The) 80 page report had criticised Jones’ broadcasts in the days leading up to the 2005 Cronulla riots.”

Mr Yusuf said that “if your buddies in the media fall foul of the law, no worries… just change the law!”

“It doesn’t sound like responsible, let alone conservative or liberal, government o me.”

Senator Brandis said that he will consult widely before introducing the legislation. “One my key priorities as Attorney-General is to rebalance the human rights debate in Australia.”

The calls for reform arise post the Eatock v. Bolt case in 2011, when the Federal Court found that newspaper columnist Andrew Bolt had acted unlawfully in reporting that fair-skinned Aboriginal people abused identity to claim welfare benefits.

In September 2011, Senator Brandis wrote, “It is clear that freedom of political expression in Australia is subject to a significant new constraint, which had not existed before. It is in the nature of political argument that it is commonly offensive to those who have the opposite view.”

“By making the reasonable likelihood of causing offence or insult the test of unacceptable behaviour, in any political context, section 18C is a grotesque limitation on ordinary political discourse. While some have pointed out the analogy with the limitations on free speech in the defamation laws, the threshold at which speech may be unlawful because it is defamatory is much higher. The tradition formula is that it must be likely to being the victim into ‘hatred, ridicule or contempt.’ There is all the difference in the world between that standard and making unlawful speech merely because it causes offence.”

“English law has always defended freedom of speech jealously.”

“Restrictions on freedom of political discourse inevitably lead to restrictions on political opinion itself. There is very little distance between speech crime and what George Orwell called thoughtcrime. What section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act seeks to do, by prohibiting the expression of political views that mainstream society finds unattractive and objectionable, is to penalise the holding of those views at all.”

Former Ethnic Communities Council WA president Suresh Rajan said that if the amendment is passed it will be in direct conflict Australia’s signing “of the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism.”

“The Declaration was committed to by our Government at the time. The Tony Abbott (led) Opposition also committed to this Declaration,” said Mr Rajan.

The signed London Declaration requires parliamentarians to speak out against discrimination ‘directed against any minority, and guard against equivocation, hesitation and justification in the face of expressions of hatred.’ The London Declaration requires parliamentarians to ‘legislate effective Hate Crime legislation.’

Libertarian principles and its bent for sincere equality can only exist fully and flourish if those with influence, and those who are part of the majority and the monopolies do have the lawful capacity to diminish and extinguish minorities and their moral and lawful rights.

The drone fired three missiles targeting a seminary near Tandharo village, a few yards from Tehsil Tal’s main Tal bazaar, which lies within the settled areas of the province. The room targetted by the drone was destroyed in the strike leaving the remaining space of the seminary undamaged.

Tal police official Sher Zaman said six people were killed in the attack. The six include Kaleemullah, Abdul Rehman, Mufti Hamidullah Haqqani, Maulvi Ahmed Jan, Abdullah and Gul Marjan, he said.

Moreover, sources told Dawn.com that Jan is said to be a key leader associated with the Haqqani network.

Official sources said Jan, believed to be a key leader of Haqqani network, had come to visit madrassah teacher Gul Marjan.

Other sources said that Abdul Rehman, an Afghan guest at the seminary, was also said to be a key leader of the network.

A resident of the area Islam Bahadar told Dawn.com that the two were present in the area for the past three to four days and that the locals had been witnessing at least four five drones flying over the madrassah and the adjacent Afghan refugee camp.

Some sources also said that Jan or Rehman might have been the target but Mufti Hamidullah, also a key figure, might have been on the hit list.

Reuters moreover reported that a source with Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security intelligence agency in Kabul said that Jan was an adviser to Sirajuddin Haqqani, the chief of the Haqqani network.

Separately, a Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters that Sirajuddin was spotted at the targeted seminary two days earlier.

Taliban sources also confirmed Jan’s death but the Haqqani network itself was not immediately available for comment.

Mufti Naimatullah, the in-charge of the seminary, however said that those killed in the strike have been identified as Maulvi Usman, a Pakistani national, while the other four killed were Afghans.

The Afghans killed in the strike are Mufti Hamidullah Haqqani, Abdul Rehman, Qari Noor Wali and Gul Marjan, he said.

The seminary that was struck has about 200 students, out of whom 70-80 stay for the night. Ten teachers teach at the seminary.

A room near the main gate of the seminary was hit thrice — the first strike occurred at 4.42, the second after 10 minutes of the first and the third after another five minutes. It has 12 rooms in all.

The madrassah was founded in 1980 and came to be properly managed from 1990.

Naimatulalh said the madrassah had “no links to any Haqqani network”.

Pakistan condemns strike

Pakistan strongly condemned the drone strike reiterating its stance that the strikes violate the country’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

Foreign Office Spokesman Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry in a statement said “there is an across the board consensus in Pakistan that these drone strikes must end”.

The spokesman said the government had been raising its concern over drone strikes with the US administration and at the United Nations.

He said the prime minister during his recent visit to the US had raised the issue with President Barack Obama and other senior US leaders.

The spokesman said it has been consistently maintained that drone strikes are counter-productive, entail loss of innocent civilian lives and have human rights and humanitarian implications. Such strikes also set dangerous precedents in the inter-state relations.

He said these strikes have a negative impact on the government’s efforts to bring peace and stability in Pakistan and in the region.

The last drone strike in the country was conducted on Nov 1 killing chief of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Hakimullah Mehsud, in the North Waziristan tribal region.

Today’s drone strike was the first by the US to occur outside Pakistan’s remote tribal region, after the Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf (PTI) came to power in the province. The latest attack could increase tensions between Islamabad and Washington.

The only other drone attack in the settled areas of KP was carried out in Bannu district in Nov 2008.

Thursday’s attack comes a day after Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs and National Security Sartaj Aziz said the US had assured Pakistan of not conducting drone strikes targeting the leaders of TTP if dialogue began between them and the Pakistani government.

http://dawn.com/news/1057599/at-least-eight-killed-in-drone-strike-on-hangu-seminary

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's Special Advisor on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz.—File Photo

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Special Advisor on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz.—File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The United States has promised that it will not carry out any drone strikes in Pakistan during any peace talks with Taliban militants in the future, the Prime Minister’s Special Advisor on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz said Wednesday.

Briefing a session of the Senate’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs in Islamabad, Aziz said a team of government negotiators was prepared to hold talks with former Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) chief Hakimullah Mehsud on Nov 2, the day after he was killed in a US drone strike in North Waziristan.

Aziz said Mehsud had been sent a list of negotiators, and that the ex-TTP chief himself had added the names of two clerics to be part of the team.

However, Aziz said the peace process had been on hold since Mehsud’s killing and that the negotiations had been badly affected by the Nov 1 drone strike.

The foreign affairs advisor said the US had assured that no drone strikes would be carried out during any peace talks. However, he did not clarify when the US had given this assurance.

Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan had told reporters last week that the process of peace talks could not be taken forward unless drone attacks on Pakistani soil are halted.

Nisar had said that the drone attack that killed Mehsud ‘sabotaged’ the government’s efforts to strike peace with anti-state militants.

http://dawn.com/news/1057411/no-more-drone-strikes-during-taliban-talks-us-assures-pakistan

709844-01-08Iran and the Western powers finally did it. After long and difficult negotiations, they came to an agreement on Tehran’s nuclear program, which will likely have an impact on the region for years to come. But don’t expect these changes to unfold quickly – there are local powers who feel that the agreement is detrimental to their interests and therefore must be contained at all costs.

Already Iran is in a strong position militarily, diplomatically and politically to increase its influence in the region. The gradual lifting of sanctions will go a long way to improve the country’s economic performance and increase the flow of cash to the government’s coffers. All this will help Tehran address many of the outstanding problems that riddle the region, from Syria, to Iraq and Lebanon.

The gradual lifting of sanctions will go a long way to improve the country’s economic performance and increase the flow of cash to the government’s coffers.

In Lebanon, for example, the political deadlock that has paralyzed the government is not likely to be resolved any time soon, as the Saudis play a key role in this file. Keeping the country hanging in this way makes it vulnerable to the kind of security breaches like the recent double suicide bombing against the Iranian embassy in Beirut. However, all indications suggest that the West’s priority in the region – and particularly in Syria – is the fight against terrorism. Already, Syrian government forces have registered sustained advances against the armed groups on critical fronts, such as Damascus, Aleppo, and Qalamoun, with instances of opposition fighters surrendering increasing by the day.

Such successes on the ground in Syria are far more important to Tehran than to strike back against those it believes were behind the attack. While Syria’s minister of information was quick to point the finger at Saudi Arabia, Iranian officials accused Israel of being the mastermind, leaving it to radical Islamist elements to carry out the operation. Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif went so far as to publish an editorial in the Saudi official daily, Asharq Alawsat, titled “Our Neighbors Are Our Priority,” in a reference to mending fences with Riyadh.Nevertheless, there are countries that are not prepared to accept the increasingly dominant logic of compromise and agreement, and will find ways to escalate the crisis, like they did in Damascus on November 24, with opposition fighters launching an assault to regain some of the ground they lost in the eastern Ghouta. Despite this, we can safely say that we are before fundamental shifts in the region’s geopolitics, with the agreement on Iran’s nuclear file opening up many possibilities that will likely benefit Tehran and its local and international allies.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.

http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/lines-game-nuclear-deal-turning-point-region