The Wikileaks Party – What’s the real story?

admin —  August 5, 2013 — 5 Comments

By WikiLeaks Party Senate candidate for Victoria Leslie Cannold

Why does Australia need WikiLeaks Party members in the Senate? How does the Wikileaks Party differ to the WikiLeaks publishing organisation? What difference can WikiLeaks Senators make to the business as usual approach both major parties take in the Senate, and how will it differ from the sort of representation offered by the Greens?

Leslie Cannold

Leslie Cannold

Such intelligent questions deserve answers that mainstream media coverage of the WikiLeaks Party (WLP) isn’t offering. Instead, much of the chat focuses on the personal life and locational issues of our first Victorian candidate, Julian Assange, the world’s best known asylum-seeker.

The mainstream media’s obsession extends to coverage of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, too. As an exasperated Professor of the Public Understanding of Technology John Naughton wrote recently in The Observer,

Repeat after me: Edward Snowden is not the story. The story is what he has revealed about the hidden wiring of our networked world. This insight seems to have escaped most of the world’s mainstream media.

The mainstream media’s indifference to the risks whistleblowers and publishers take to reveal corruption is a key cause of Australia’s democratic decline. It is this democratic decline that the The Wikileaks Party formed to rectify. As I wrote a few years ago in The Age:

There are rules that have long governed the way the democratic game is played…These define what is and isn’t cricket when it comes to how individuals and institutions engage in our democracy. It is these procedures and values, often unarticulated and widely taken for granted, that are under siege now and [are] the cause of Australia’s democratic decline.

Corruption is the cancer eating away at our democracy. At one end of the spectrum is lawbreaking, at the other unprincipled practices that both law and policy ignore. As Joo-Cheong Tham wrote recently in his book Money and Democracy, the very “integrity of [Australia’s] representative government is under challenge.”

This challenge is less because of the flagrant lawbreaking revealed by the ICAC inquiry into NSW politicians Obeid and MacDonald, and more because of informal practices that see Australia’s wealthy and well-connected receive preferential treatment.

This happens in both the public and the private sectors. Indeed, as Yochai Benkler argues, the financial blockade of by Paypal, Mastercard, Visa and Bank of America well outstripped the power of government to exert force on an organisation it doesn’t like:

If we were to consider what judicial process would be required for the government to…exclud[e] an organization from the payment systems because of the content of information that organization disseminated, the barriers in law would have been practically insurmountable. However, the implicit alliance, a public-private partnership between the firms that operate the infrastructure and the government…was able to achieve extra-legally much more than law would have allowed the state to do by itself.

Corruption is rotting the foundations of Australian democracy. Democracy is the toolkit we need to solve the pressing problems facing our nation. These include poverty, inequality and climate change.

Saving our democracy involves ridding it of corruption. The solution to corruption is transparency, accountability and justice. The solution to the problem of Australia’s democratic decline is WikiLeaks.

The Wikileaks Party formed to bring transparency, accountability and justice into the political process. If we win seats in the Senate, we intend to pass laws that demand government and corporate transparency and accountability. If we win seats in the Senate, we plan to institute policies that protect and defend whistleblowers and the public interest media organisations that disseminate their disclosures. is a publisher. It disseminates public interest disclosures leaked to it by whistleblowers. The WikiLeaks Party is a political organisation. We demand transparency and accountability from powerful institutions and stop them wreaking revenge on those who expose corruption.

How does it work? If the risks associated with leaking are reduced, more insiders aware of corruption will reveal it. As public and private organisations grow fearful any corruption will be exposed, they engage in less of it. This was the critical insight behind the secure electronic dropbox provided to leakers on the publishing site. “There are few original ideas in politics, Professor Robert Manne noted recently. “This was one of them.”

The sheer brilliance of the WikiLeaks answer to institutional corruption has been revealed by the viciousness with which the US and its allies – Australia included – have pursued WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange and whistleblowers Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden. Civil libertarians gave a sigh of relief when Manning was acquitted of charges that he “aided the enemy.” But the guilty verdict included the made-up charge of “wanton publication,” a charge that Crikey’s Bernard Keane says should worry American and Australian journalists alike. Notes Mike Bochenek of Amnesty International, “It’s hard not to draw the conclusion that the US government is trying to send a message that it will come down hard on whistleblowers.”

When faced with evidence of systemic failure, the reaction of corporates and governments is to shoot the messenger. We are the messenger, and our message is that the WikiLeaks Party won’t turn a blind eye to corruption. We see the writing on the wall for Australian democracy and know just how TO erase it. The Wikileaks pursuit of transparency, accountability and justice can reverse democratic decline, and make Australia safe for democracy again.


Posts Google+

5 responses to The Wikileaks Party – What’s the real story?

  1. It would be nice to at least have a choice! Awareness will give the people this as opposed to current deceitful undertakings. Personally I feel people are ready to hear the truth 😉

  2. Joshua asks how Wikileaks plans to tackle importation of food, the lack of jobs, debt. In other words, if democracy is under siege nobody do anything to tackle _that_ but switch to other problems. Anything but confront a threat to democracy. Anything but tackle corruption. Anything but tackle the government and corporate secrecy that shields the very corruption that prevents government tackling root causes of loss of farm income, lack of jobs, (confected) debt crises. OK, for one thing those problems can be tackled best by upholding Australian independence. Trade deals that make foreign slavery the decider of Australian working and living conditions are negotiated in strict secrecy. Wikileaks works to blow holes in the secrecy. Exposure – which freaks the secret planners out – opens the field for others to tackle the corruption that secrecy hides. Official secrecy, Wikileaks’ target, iks a powerful tool for corruption. Individual privacy is not. Indeed individual privacy is a cloak under which whistleblowers can get to the truth about official corruption.

  3. John Naughton tells us that ‘Ed Snowden is not the story’ but Leslie Cannold says in the next paragraph that the media’s indifference to the risks whistleblowers take is causing a ‘democratic decline’ in Australia. Who’s right? Both seem eager to criticise the media but do either know what they’re talking about? Ed Snowden and the risks he has taken to his life and career is definitely a story, as it is for Julian Assange and Bradley Manning. While some publishers might be ambivalent about their motives, the media has relied on individuals such as these throughout history to expose corruption. If the WikiLeaks party hopes to justify its formation by dumping on the media, then it might as well as merge with the Greens now and stop wasting our time masquerading as a new political voice.

  4. While I agree with the ethics behind what you’re trying to achieve.
    Do you believe that we, the public are ready for this?
    If we knew everything the Government knew, I think it would be chaos.

    Australia is in such bad shape at the moment,
    the last thing I care about is how the government plans to watch me shower at night.
    How the top cop was selling drugs to teenagers for extra cash.
    If Australia don’t think there is corruption, then they are too blind anyway.

    What I’m interested is what the Wikileaks party plan to do to create jobs, and get Australia moving. What do you plan to do with the importation of food, while Aussie farmers are burning crops?

    What are your plans to get rid of Australia’s debt?

    All Governments have secrets, how are you going to prove that you’re not keeping any? How is the Wikileaks party going to stop corruption from the inside?

    • … How the minister was creating mining leases so that his mates made a motza.

      (Perhaps if the minister had a much higher expectation that his misdeeds would become public then he would have behaved better.)

      The WikiLeaks Party is only running in the Senate. Many people are concerned about jobs, food security and government debt – and many other things besides. Ultimately it is for the government of the day to introduce measures in those areas.

      What the WikiLeaks Party can do is to ensure that measures that the government introduces are genuinely intended to do what the government says they will do and to force the government to release information relating to the policy that will allow others to judge that.

      I believe that the Australian public is mature enough to handle the truth.

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML.

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>